Man standing on a massive iceberg

Asher’s relationship with words has been unusual, to say the least.

For the first six years of his life, he was a solitary and almost silent child. He avoided social contact and, he tells me, spent much of his time thinking. Six years is a long time to think. Imagine a sage or a yogi in retreat on a mountain somewhere without the distractions of everyday chatter and interaction. You may think it’s fanciful to compare a quiet pre-schooler to a highly developed adult seeker of enlightenment, but Asher insists that small children are not born stupid before gradually learning wisdom; that they are still very much in touch with their aware spiritual selves before human socialisation has taken its toll. Looked at from that perspective, perhaps it’s easier to accept.

That time of silent contemplation was followed, in his case, by more than twenty years of concentrated effort to acquire and refine his language skills. Once he became motivated to learn to use spoken language, things started to change. Learning to manipulate the muscles of his mouth to form intelligible sounds was arduous work at first, but that was nowhere near as hard as picking up the doublespeak of social worded language — the euphemisms, obscurities, sarcasm, ironic asides and frequent mismatch between thoughts and words. Those still remain confusing and difficult for him, as they do for many neurodivergent and/or telepathic people.

Despite the challenges, he mastered almost every phoneme required to speak English, developed an impressive vocabulary and managed to inject enough prosody (expression) into his speech to make it relatively easy for others to listen to. By the time he reached adulthood, Asher had mastered words.

There was a problem, though. Words served him well enough in daily interactions and gave him the ability to live a more-or-less independent life, but they failed him miserably when he wanted to share his metaphysical understanding.

“Don’t bother asking me what visiting another dimension is like,” he’d tell me. “There are no words to describe it.”

Sometimes he would settle unhappily for the closest word to the concept he wanted to share. (“I’m not 100% sure if the term ‘energy’ is perhaps the most appropriate but admittedly I have nothing better so will use it for clarity purposes.”) However, as his out-of-body explorations of astral realms became more expansive, his ability to convey the experiences in words began to break down.

Gradually, his willingness to engage in spoken or written dialogues with me about such matters started to decline. He continued using speech and writing in his commonplace life, but withdrew, first from speaking and later from writing about the paranormal aspects to me. As explained in detail in my book, A Mind Beyond Words, Asher divided himself into two parts: the everyday physical man going about his daily life and talking when he needed to, and the metaphysical being whose consciousness was mostly located out-of-body and who communicated with me by direct mind-to-mind contact.

He’d given words his best shot and found them lacking for his purposes, so he tossed them aside and concentrated on helping me to develop non-verbal dialogue to an acceptable standard.

As someone deeply immersed in words, both spoken and written, I found losing all verbal contact with Asher difficult. On a very personal level, I still miss his voice and receiving those wonderful, rambling discourses he used to send me.

I am somewhat able, though, to put aside my own self-pity when, as in the following telepathic discussion, he conveys his own responses to worded as opposed to non-worded conversation.

I find it hard to imagine a sensitivity so intense that each word uttered would feel like throwing a missile at the other, but this dialogue allows a deep gaze into how crass and unyielding 3D life feels to someone more comfortable in higher, non-physical dimensions.

Here, in a still very ‘condensed’ form, Asher explains why he dislikes using words, and prefers our way of communicating:

Jes: You once told me that if you had a two-minute spoken conversation with me, you would spend around two hours afterwards going over it in your mind, pulling apart every word and nuance. Is that still the case?

Asher: It does complicate potential interaction.

Jes: And yet that doesn’t apply for you in non-verbal dialogue?

Asher: Words are frozen thoughts.

They become solid and intractable, like hurling lumps of ice at someone.

They’re cold and heavy. They can hurt.

Sending my thoughts to you is like sending a cloud of water vapour.

They don’t take form until they reach your mind.

There, you condense them into a liquid state. They become a joint process between us.

I say ‘liquid’ because you have some leeway as to how you receive them.

You pick up a gestalt: I can send feelings, sensations, memories and a context along with the meaning. It flows.

Jes: You really don’t like words, do you?

Asher: No, I don’t.

He’s correct, of course. I rarely receive his thoughts as a stream of words. There are textures of meaning and background context which rarely make their way into my written renditions of his thoughts. Yet the process is often only subliminally recognised as I struggle to record his messages and keep the dialogue going.

I know how incredibly lucky I am in this respect. Imagine, if you’ve never been fortunate enough to experience it, how freeing it is to send or receive an emotion directly to and from someone else’s heart. No limiting words. No hunting for an apt simile or some figurative way to describe it. The whole, utter, complete sensation moves straight from one individual to the other. Of course, our phones are great at instantly transmitting photos or videos of a scene to someone miles away, but with telepathy, you get not just the pictures, but the sounds, the space, the temperature, even, and you feel it the way the sender does. Best of all, it works as well for an imagined event as for one being experienced in ‘real’ time, whatever that is.

This post is a slightly abbreviated extract from our second book collaboration, which is currently being put together.

4 Comments

  1. Jes, is Asher really as unique and special as he sounds? Since I’ve gotten so engrossed in this since The Telepathy Tapes and read yours and Asher’s book A Mind Beyond Words, and Katie Asher’s book The Book of Heaven; I have not heard any other autistic telepath talking about remembering their previous life and adult knowledge when they are 2 years old. Also, Ashers seems to be drawn to the Realms (instead of the 3D world), and I don’t think he’s talking about the Hill, or is he? Take care Jes, looking forward to your new book.

    • Hi Ron,
      The honest answer is, I’m not sure! A reader sent me the name of a young man on YouTube who also started to move out of body at 16 and talks a lot about The Realms, so there clearly are others.
      Asher is rather different from most of the spellers in The Telepathy Tapes, as he’s turned his back on words, rather than having recently discovered worded conversations. Maybe that makes a difference.
      He doesn’t seem to visit the Hill, although he tells me he’s had contact with other autistic telepaths individually. He’s always been a loner and not one for social situations!
      Best wishes,
      Jes

  2. It sounds like Asher is on a personal quest, an experience of using his state of being as an earthly body to use the opportunity to secure the richness of his discoveries and then try to share their richness with you.
    The clarity and conciseness of words sounds like what he sees and experiences is truly wondrous an infinite space where all the knowledge of the ages is stored for the benefit of all those with the capabilities to comprehend it. Like an all-of-life experience of everyone in one place with guides to sharer and show what you need to find. Simply wonderful.

  3. This week I consumed your book
    “A Mind Beyond Words”
    By Jez Kerzen

    Within the pages of this book was an equation written by Asher that I knew I needed to breakdown to completely understand.

    He has shared something to explain what is coming for the world with what looks like a simple equation, because the concept to explain would take too long and use words that are like ice rocks frozen in time.

    Being an inquisitive and investigative mind I decided to use some of the resources at my fingertips and I think that I have what you ALL know is coming. Now you can see the structure and direction.

    What is F( (p=n) >(p=B) )

    Based on your definitions in the text afterwards in the book:
    • F = Financial collapse
    • p = The first group, those who gain power from a new paradigm
    • B = The second group, the materialists, who are outnumbered
    • N = The masses, who focus on cooperation and rebuilding

    Interpretation of :

    This expression suggests a condition for financial collapse (F) based on power dynamics between two groups:
    • (p = N) > (p = B)means that the power of the cooperative masses (N) surpasses the power of the materialists (B).
    • The function F(…)implies that the probability or occurrence of a financial collapse is influenced by this power shift.

    Possible Meaning:
    • If the cooperative masses (N) gain more power than the materialists (B), then financial collapse (F) is triggered or becomes more probable.
    • This could represent a systemic shift, where a new social and economic structure emerges, potentially destabilizing the old financial order.
    • The materialists (B), who rely on the existing financial system, may lose control, leading to disruptions in markets, capital flows, and governance.
    • The new paradigm group (p)could be navigating this shift, either as architects of change or as opportunists leveraging the collapse.

    Implications:
    • Could represent a post-capitalist transition, where wealth, power, and resources shift away from materialist elites toward a cooperative, sustainable society.
    • Financial institutions and economic structures built on materialist values (B) might struggle or collapseunder the weight of new societal priorities (N).
    • The “collapse” (F) might not be purely destructive but instead a transformation, where old financial models give way to new, cooperative systems.

    This equation shall be known henceforth as “The Asher Equation” a legacy for humanity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *